Anne Boleyn, an innocent victim, or seductress


.

Henry was moving on to a new wife, Jane Seymour... with whom he hoped to have a surviving male heir.

Her pro-French stance on diplomacy was a problem, when Cromwell wanted an alliance with the Holy Roman Empire.
Could Cromwell, who devised the case against Anne, want to remove her as an obstacle to his plans.....

Six people, accused of treason against the King......the Jury knew what was expected of them, and the verdict they had to give.
Anne, her brother George Boleyn, Sir Henry Norris, Sir Francis Weston, William Brereton and Mark Smeaton, all had very little hope of any justice.

“They were condemned upon presumption and certain indications, without valid proof or confession”.
No witnesses were produced against Anne and her brother either, and they defended themselves admirably.
George was described as replying “so well” to the charges
“that several of those present wagered 10 to 1 that he would be acquitted”
It was all fruitless, all were found guilty and condemned to death.

Anne was sentenced to burning or bEheading~
“as the King’s pleasure shall be further known of the same”.
The Hangman of Calais, who was well known for his skill at beheading by sword, was sent for.
It is now widely believed this was done, before Anne had even been found guilty.

According to the indictments, not only had she slept with these men, as a result of her “frail and carnal appetites”, but she had also conspired with them to kill her husband, the king.

Anne was not present at the places at the times stated~
For example, in October 1533, when Anne was accused of “procuring” Sir Henry Norris to “violate” her at Westminster, Anne was still confined to her chambers at Greenwich, after the birth of her daughter, Elizabeth.
In 1535, when she was supposed to have been seducing Mark Smeaton at Greenwich, the queen was actually at Richmond.

She’d been queen for just three years.......
.

.

.

Reacties
Een reactie posten